Logan Atone, My Other Blog

I realized that religion has a treasure trove of reasoning schemes just ripe for analysis, so I've been spending a lot of my time building and participating in the Logan Atone blog. Its an equal partnership collaboration between two Christians and I.

Trends

trend
1. after christmas sales
2. tsunami
3. sheen
4. walmart
5. pope
6. tehran
7. ipod touch
8. vic chesnutt
9. gaza
10. brittany murphy

More Hot Topics:

Hot Searches (USA)
1. brooke mueller sheen
2. umar farouk abdul mutallab
3. target day after christmas sales 2009
4. terrorist attack detroit
5. charlie sheen
6. richard reid
7. sarah silverman
8. nd tiwari video
9. dj richardson
10. nigerian terrorist

1. santa claus
2. merry christmas
3. telangana
4. murphy
5. 3 idiots
6. hyderabad
7. doctor who
8. walmart
9. sarandon
10. tim robbins

More Hot Topics:

Hot Searches (USA)
1. infragard
2. elijah wood
3. ultradns
4. farmville presents
5. ray allen twitter
6. volga girl
7. poinsettia bowl
8. wayne bent
9. shawn king
10. friday after next

Rules for Critical Discussion

Rules for Critical Discussion
by Frans Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst,
taken from "Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation" by Douglas Walton,
Cambridge University Press, 2006.



1. Parties must not prevent each other from advancing or casting doubt on each
others viewpoints.

2. Whoever advances a viewpoint is obliged to defend it if asked to do so.

3. An attack on a viewpoint must represent the viewpoint that has really been
advanced by the protagonist.

4. A viewpoint may be defended or attacked only by advancing argumentation
that is relevant to that viewpoint.

5. A person can be held responsible for the unstated premises he leaves implicit
in his argument.

6. A viewpoint is regarded as conclusively defended only if the defense takes
place by means of argumentation based on premises accepted by the other party,
and it meets the requirements of Rule 8.

7. A viewpoint is regarded as conclusively defended only if the defense takes
place by means of arguments in which an argumentation scheme is correctly
applied.

8. A viewpoint is regarded as conclusively defended only if supported by a chain
of argumentation meeting the requirements of rules 6 and 7 and if the unstated
premises in the chain of argumentation are accepted by the other party.

9. A failed defense must result in the proponent withdrawing her thesis and a
successful defense must result in the respondent withdrawing his doubt about
the proponents thesis.

10. Formulations of questions and arguments must not be obscure, excessively
vague, or confusingly ambiguous and must be interpreted as accurately as
possible.

Feedback Please!

Please contribute your feedback here.

Notes

Categories
Click "Read more >>" for access.My Categories
Study of
///// Categories with ScienceDaily links ///////////////////
* Anthropology - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/fossils_ruins/anthropology/

* Behavior - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind_brain/behavior/
-- Borderline Personality Disorder - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind_brain/borderline_personality_disorder/

* Behavioral Science - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/plants_animals/behavior/

* Cognitive Bias - http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/cognitive_bias.htm
- http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/l/list_of_cognitive_biases.htm

* Perception - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind_brain/perception/

* Memory - memory: http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind_brain/memory/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/l/list_of_memory_biases.htm

* Free Will - site:www.sciencedaily.com "free will"

* Witness Testimony - site:www.sciencedaily.com "eye witness"
- site:www.sciencedaily.com "eyewitness"

* Communication - site:www.sciencedaily.com "communication"

* Cognition - http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/cognition.htm

* Animal Cognition - http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/a/animal_cognition.htm

///// Categories without ScienceDaily links ///////////////////
* Evidence
* IDQ
* Relationships
* Love
* Suffering
* Benevolence
* Omniscience
* Omnipotence
* spirituality - http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind_brain/spirituality/


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Defining terms and scope of
* Suffering
* Love
* Benevolence
* Omniscience
* Omnipotence

Principles of:
* Evidence, Witness Testimony
* Information and Data Quality
* Communication
* Relationships
* Perenting
* Reasoning
* Benevolence







the rest

Topic Heirarchy

Cognitive Science,
  |_Comparative Psychology, Animal Cognition
  |_Epistemology
  |_Decision Making
    |_
       |_

  |_Dualism
    |_Free Will
    |_Morality
    |_Soul
    |_Spirit
    |_Consciousness



    |_

Feedback Please!

Leave me some feedback in the comment section. Thanks in advance!

Suggestions, Requests, Questions? Click Here.

Click on the comments link to add them. I get comments sent to me in real time via email.

Why All the News Posts?

I track and post news articles to sample and display in real time the effect that religious and faith based decision making has on the world.

Why Link to ScienceDaily.com?

I link to ScienceDaily.com because it demonstrates in real time the superiority of the scientific method in acquiring Quality Information and Knowledge.  Science isn't about debunking religions, its about improving our quality of life using the resources at hand. If religions can't keep up, then they need a better strategy.

Scope Of The Blog

The blog treats sacred text as data in a database. It cross-checks sacred text against principles and data from the following fields of study listed below.
+ Anthropology
   - Cultural
   - Linguistics
+ Cognitive Science
   - Bias
   - Biological Bases Of Behavior
+ Communication
   - Relationships
* Complexity Theory
* Decision Theory
* Epistemology
* Game Theory
* Information and Data Quality
* Informal Logic
* Information Theory
+ Philosophy
   - Epistemology
   - of Free Will
   - of Mind
* Probability
* Persuasion
* Statistics

Why Link To Wikipedia?

I link to Wikipedia liberally not because it's authoritative, but because it's a good place to start research and its mostly accurate. I occasionally edit Wikipedia.

Some Articles Look Familiar?

This blog has been constructed from material that I've contributed to other blogs over the years.

Why the Pseudonym?

I use a pseudonym, which I change from time to time, to try to avoid the stalker problem that seems to result from reasoned criticism of Religion. My new pseudonym better represents my personality; Knowledgeable and light hearted. The last pseudonym was a hybrid modeled after Howard Beale from the movie "Network" and someones profile that popped up in google one day so it didn't reflect the "real me". "Can you see the real me?" (Quadrophenia by The Who)

IDQ Dimension Category of Intrinsic Labels

Intrinsic IQ:
Accuracy, Objectivity, Believability, Reputation

[Other Categories]
Contextual IQ:
Relevancy, Value-added, Timeliness, Completeness, Amount of Information

Representational IQ:
Interpretability, Understandability, Concise Representation, Consistent Representation

Accessibility IQ:
Access, Security